Skip to main content

European Environmental Bureau: Information society for people, not for governments

Addressing the MOP during a high-level panel discussion, EEB Secretary General Jeremy Wates drew attention to the link between the Edward Snowden revelations of mass surveillance of citizens by certain governments and the Convention’s goal of greater public access to information held by public authorities: “While governments obtain more and more information about the activities of their citizens, the same governments continue to prevent citizens from having access to information held by public authorities. This is not the ‘information society’ we have been calling for.”

Wates also used the opportunity to call for the expansion of the Convention’s Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers to a “Protocol 2.0”, which would encompass resource use, products and storage: “Many pollutants leave the factory in the form of products and thus escape the reporting requirements under the Protocol. Others are stored on site, representing a potential hazard to neighbouring communities. And if we want the Protocol to serve as a real driver of sustainability, it should also cover inputs such as energy, water and resources.”

The MoP-5 also welcomes Iceland, Ireland and Switzerland as new Parties joining the Aarhus family. NGOs and many Parties are eager for a geographical expansion beyond the UNECE region so many were satisfied to see that Mongolia also showed an interest to join. It was also encouraging to see country representatives, NGOs and scientists from Chile, the Caribbean, Morocco, Mexico, Japan and China present at the meeting.

New members Ireland and Switzerland immediately ratified the GMO amendment to the Convention, which provides a mechanism for public participation in decision-making on the deliberate release into the environment and the use of GMOs. Of particular interest were the Compliance Committee's findings of non-compliance by a significant number of Parties (2). At MoP5, Armenia, Austria, Belarus, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Germany, Kazachstan, Romania, Spain, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, UK and the European Union were found to be in non-compliance.

For more information

Mara Silina, Aarhus Programme coordinator @ EEB & European ECO Forum 0032(0)472505031 [email protected] or Nick Meynen 0032(0)485457373 [email protected]

The European ECO Forum unites more than 200 civil society organisations in a coalition that works together on issues such as the Aarhus Convention. More on this website.

1 Adopted in 1998 under the auspices of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the Aarhus Convention seeks to guarantee the rights of the public to have access to information, to participate in decision-making and to have access to justice in environmental matters. The Parties come from Europen the Caucasus and Central Asia.

2 The Compliance Committee is a unique body of individuals who are mandated to make an independent evaluation on whether Parties to the Aarhus Convention are in compliance with their obligations.

READ ARTICLE

Stay up to date

Sign up here for email updates on latest news and resources:
The subscriber's email address.