Costs – The Court of Appeal held that the need for the claimant to have no “private interest in the outcome of case” (one of the “criteria” established in the Corner House case), is not decisive when the“interest” is not a private law interest, but one the claimant shares with the other members of his group in the protection of the environment. Also noting that the provisions of the Aarhus Convention may be relevant.
Country/countries, region:
Resource convention articles:
Languages:
English
Publisher:
UNECE / Task Force on Access to JusticeDate published:
01-02-2017Court/body:
Court of AppealDecision date:
20-12-2006
Read full resource: