As the deputy Jordi Jané CiU [1] Application of geological reports have been denied on the grounds that not all possess. But in the case of Ecologists in Action, the delay in his laconic reply was 27 days, near the boundary of a month by the Law 27/2006 regulating (among other matters) the rights of access to environmental information [ 2]. In his letter, however, states that it would forward the letter to ENRESA. More than a month has taken the City to answer "not held by the same or another entity on its behalf." Ie, sent the letter out of time. However, the secretary of the City (Carmen ship), has admitted that report "but unofficially" so Ecologists in Action has appealed the denial on appeal of environmental information, considering unacceptable for a member of an authority public, possesses such a fundamental and sensible owners title report. Should not be taken in the appeal by administrative Greenpeace attend the "Compliance Committee of the Aarhus Convention" and, where appropriate, to the courts.
ENRESA
Five questions were sent from Ecologists in Action through the form web. ENRESA answered evasively all. An example: Ask the representative of Ecologists in Action: "Why not give the characterization studies to know the grounds of ATC commissioned by the company specifically for the geotechnical study awarded 144,500 Euros to the joint venture and Golder Associates? ATSG, delivered on 14 February last. " Enresa Answer: "The Preliminary Safety Analysis ENRESA being prepared in compliance with mandatory regulations, including all supporting information site developed by technicians ENRESA based on the analysis, discussion and verification of the work on site characterization. " On the other hand, the director of legal services Enresa, upon receiving the letter from the Ministry (in turn sent by Ecologists in Action) meets (almost a month later ) requiring additional documents to confirm the status of president of Ecologists in Action Basin applicant, the representative thereof and copies of statutes. These documents are unnecessary, because the law says that an applicant for environmental information may be "any natural or legal person ...". The application is on 21 October the Ministry of Industry and ENRESA issues its letter of formal notice on 20 December.
NEW APPLICATIONS
Ecologists in Action has again asked to ENRESA information (meeting their demands although considered absurd) and, for the first time , the Nuclear Safety Council. President ENRESA and political Francisco Gil-Ortega, has insisted in his testimony before Congress on 17 December that the land is favorable [3]. Ecologists in Action, Gil-Ortega should explain why and again denied this information (you are entitled to any citizen who requests under Law 27/2006, emanating from the Aarhus Convention) if true that the land is suitable.
[1] http://sociedad.elpais.com/sociedad/2013/10/19/actualidad/1382210495_072919.html
[2] https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2006/07/19/pdfs/A27109-27123.pdf
[3] http://www.enresa.es/actualidad/weblog/post/presidente_de_enresa_congreso_terreno_atc_idoneo
